Monster
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
Turnover
(In thousands of dollars)666,903
725,571
76,3935
843,896
942,110
Net profit (loss)
(In thousands of dollars)73,612
(289,289)
(482)
(258,719)
53,794
Shareholders equity
(In thousands of dollars)
481,406
474,745
844,145
880,039
1,164,127
Source: Annual Report 2015, Monster Worldwide
| 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 |
Turnover (In thousands of dollars) | 299,0911 | 221,8767 | 1,528,545 | 972,309 | 522,189 |
Net profit (loss) (in thousands of dollars) | (164,761) | (15,320) | 26,769 | 21,610 | 11,912 |
Shareholders equity (In thousands of dollars) | 4,468,643 | 3,325,392 | 2,629,394 | 908,424 | 624,979 |
Source: Annual Report 2015, LinkedIn Corporation
Using similarweb.com, we prepared a clear demonstration for you by comparing the number of visits to Monster.com and LinkedIn.com. It's interesting that compared to its total volume of traffic, Monster is more successful in terms of visits from search engines. The total number of visits, however, speaks for itself. While Monster recorded 32.8 million visits per month over the last six months, LinkedIn encountered 907 million visits a month.
Do the same trends apply on the online job market in the Czech Republic? As you might guess, they don't. You can read more about it in the next article.
-kk-