Conflicts arising from team diversity can be handled by good leaders who are able to lead their teams to cooperate better and prioritize team interests over individual ones.
The most recent research shows that a moderate level of team diversity is more beneficial than a high level. Too many cooks spoil the broth, and even the best things have a dark side.
Team diversity is mostly perceived from a demographic perspective, i.e. the gender, age or race of team members. However, aspects of so-called deep diversity, such as personality, values or abilities, play a more important role.
Diversity itself can't increase team creativity unless a knowledge sharing culture works in the team. The contact points in social networks should be staffed with business thinking employees, called intrapreneurs.
Diversity training has more impact on employees who are skeptical about diversity. Training can persuade them to actively support this concept much better compared those with a neutral view, or those who can see a potential in diversity.
The structure and composition of teams has less influence on the development of creativity and innovations than factors such as support for innovation, vision, focus on tasks and external communication. Furthermore, it is important to develop the expertise and skills of the team members, assign tasks to the right people, and strengthen their ability in creative thinking.
"A better way to promote both creativity and diversity is to select employees on the basis of their creativity, as opposed to their cognitive ability or educational credentials, for that alone would enhance the typical diversity level of organizations. In that sense, creativity may lead to diversity more than vice versa," concludes Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic.
-kk-
Article source Harvard Business Review - flagship magazine of Harvard Business School