We've run huge campaigns from our global health team to support employees in these uncertain times or also when they don't know how they should sit at the computer, take breaks, how to relax. I think it's also important to communicate to your employees not only that they should rest but also how they can do that.
That's a great question. Honestly, when I started as an HR Director in Central & Eastern Europe and I lived in Prague for three years, I knew there were cultural differences between the Czech Republic and Germany. It's different in each country, and so we also have diverse and really very different approaches to these topics, which I love. Of course, we have to respect these cultural differences and bear them in mind.
We have a global approach to these issues as a company and we roll them out in each country and in accordance with the legislation there. We have great teams of HR directors in different locations, they know the environment perfectly and they know how best to adapt to the given issue. In some places, for example, it works by having the employees organise their own lunch break, take a break together or even do yoga. As management, we are there to give them the opportunity to take time off between work and they can always turn to us.
Finally, what is important to me is that even though we have a global approach as SAP, we are able to put in place conditions in different countries that make sense for the location and culture, also taking into account the wishes of the employees.
It is true that the company has not been affected by the pandemic in a negative way, so we have not had to make any layoffs; on the contrary, we are extremely thankful to have been hiring.
We have also seen cases where we had vacancies in one country but couldn't find the right candidates, then suddenly someone from another country applied. They said they were interested but couldn't move because of the pandemic and, moreover, they didn't want to move. Two years ago, we may have told them we needed someone in the given location, but now we knew the world was opening up again and it was not necessary to work directly from the office or even in the given country all the time. And, if really necessary, we can arrange business travel. This opens up more opportunities not only for companies to have more talent, but also for the candidates themselves.
But I have to say that despite all the pandemic constraints, we have been able to fill the most crucial positions and also that the pandemic has allowed us to be more creative than ever in recruiting.
If companies decide to go down the path of digital HR transformation and adopt the tools to do so, yes. I think the technical implementation of these solutions is the smallest and fastest part. We need to think about where we want to go as a company, how we want to develop the company culture, what and who we want to stand for. Based on this, we should think about what processes we need and how we will structure them.
In my experience, if companies are thinking about changes in HR processes or talent management, for example, my recommendation is that they should first of all find out if this is what they need now, where the company culture is developing to and before that analyze and optimize the existing HR model, namely define how they want to take it to the next level. Once that question is defined, then the actual implementation can proceed.
If we just come up with the idea that we want to become a digital HR organisation but we don't bring any tools or solutions, then I can almost say with certainty that it will not happen. Digitising a company requires change management and rethinking processes, which leads to the effective use of other digitisation tools. Then you have more time to focus on employees and break free from the old model of thinking of the entire organisation.
I believe it is absolutely crucial for managers to have a personal approach to each employee on the team so that they can get to know and anticipate what that person needs to do their job to the best of their ability. Again, I'll come back to the fact that what you need is empathy. And if you have a diverse team, you need to lead each person in a slightly different way; that's the only way you're going to get the results you need as a leader.
Certainly knowledge or expertise of whatever the team is working on is important. But of course it's also good for leaders to be able to discuss and help with decision making. I think what we ultimately need is to have a diverse team which brings together quite different people with different mindsets and approaches. If we give them the opportunity to grow as leaders and create the space for them to do that, they also get a sense of doing work they can actually thrive in. Of course, this requires a lot of trust as well, but employees will then grow until they outgrow themselves and the results will ultimately be even better than if we took over all the decisions and the path towards the goal from a leadership position. I think we should be available whenever we are needed. We need to help take the first step and all the steps that follow.
In the end, however, it won't be us, the leaders, who are the smartest on the team, but rather the team with different skills that we have to orchestrate to be as successful as possible.
We have a lot of internal programmes for leaders at different levels and I think that's a very good decision from a global perspective. If we identify colleagues who are not yet leaders today, but becoming a leader could be the next step for them, we would like to prepare them. We also have what we call mandatory programmes for first-level leaders. We have long-term programmes, but we also have time-limited or, let's say, ad hoc development opportunities due to changes in strategy because management also has to be able to react to the evolution of the situation and anticipate new things that leaders should explore and know.
I think from a global perspective we have a lot of flagship programmes for leaders at every level. It's great that there are both mandatory and voluntary programmes they can choose from. Of course, we support mentoring and coaching. We have a huge community of coaches, and we offer free coaching for all leaders and employees. In short, I think we have a very well-developed educational package.
I'll put it simply and honestly: the immediate steps after the pandemic will be to set things in order. As I said, at the beginning of the pandemic we started working from home immediately because even governments presented things in a way that, where possible, people should work from home. But we didn't have a clear framework in all countries for that. It's not anchored in employment law but we managed to implement it anyway and that helped us at SAP to be number one.
The concept of the future of work is not really a burning issue for me anymore because the changes mentioned earlier are happening now. But what we definitely will need in HR is a structure of organisations and, let's say, the framing a new model of work for how our employees will function in the future. I think there will be a strong emphasis on this, not only in Eastern Europe but around the world, to anchor it all.
I believe this pandemic has raised several new topics about HR strategy overall and what employees need from employers. We need rather to reimagine the employee in their own skin and define the difference between an employee at work and a human being in their personal life.
I think we have a lot of strategic thinking to do and we really need to set in order what we previously had to start doing in a hurry. We now need to put things into the correct framework and build from there.